ABSTRACT
Hyaluronan-coated surfaces are valuable on medical devises because they impart lubricity and resistance to non-specific binding by platelets, cells and serum proteins. Yet hyaluronan binds to a number of cells via specific surface receptors. For example, hyaluronan binds to two specific surface receptors on mature sperm, PH20 and RHAMM1,2. When sperm binds hyaluronan in solution, swimming vigor increases, a change reflected in the rapidity of tail motion (cross beat frequency)3. Sperm encounter
hyaluronan in the cervical mucus and in the cumulus matrix
surrounding the oocyte. Penetration of the cervical mucus and
the cumulus matrix are critical factors in successful
fertilization. Sperm-hyaluronan interaction facilitates these
processes as well as others critical to conception. Therefore,
it was of interest to see if sperm would bind to a hyaluronan
coating covalently attached to a surface, to determine if such
binding could be used to assess sperm-hyaluronan interaction.

A schematic of the cumulus-oocyte complex.
Legend
CC= Cumulus Cells
CM= Cumulus Matrix
PV= Perivitilline Space
EPM= Egg Plasma Membrane
EGG= Oocyte
ZP=
Zona Pellucida
Conventional disposable sperm counting chambers were modified by attaching a layer of hyaluronan via an isocyanate binding agent. Mature sperm that encountered this layer bound themselves to it and could easily be distinguished from immature, non-hyaluronan binding sperm. A simple assay for mature sperm was devised based on this device. The assay has shown that semen samples from different individuals with suspected male factor infertility show percentages of hyaluronan-binding sperm that vary from essentially zero to essentially 100%. Studies are in progress to determine the utility of this assay as an indicator of semen infertility.
BACKGROUND
A. Hyaluronan (HA): A high molecular weight mucopolysaccharide formed from alternating N-acetylglucosamine and 3-glucuronic acid.
HA plays a central role
in the formation of the extracellular matrix of tissue,
especially skin, vitreous humor of the eye, joints,
cartilage, etc.
HA solutions are
viscoelastic. HA contributes to the lubricity and “shock
absorption” of articulating joints.
HA receptors, such as
CD44 and RHAMM, are expressed on the surface of a number of
both normal and malignant cells and are involved in cell
motility and tissue repair.
B. Normal Conception
Normal semen is
comprised of a mixture of fully functional, motile, mature
sperm and up to 50% immature, motile or non-motile, abnormal
and infertile sperm.
Normal conception
includes a series of steps that select mature, fertile sperm
and only allows the selected sperm to contact the egg plasma
membrane and to fertilize the egg.
Sperm-HA interactions
play key roles in this selection process.
C. HA-Sperm Interactions

Two-second time-lapse fluroresence micrographs of sperm in the control chamber (A, lift side) and the HA-coated chamber (B, right side). The sperm were treated with a dye that illuminates only their heads. Wavy lines show progressive swimming by motile sperm. In the HA-coated chamber, the majority of sperm have bound to the hyaluronan and appear immotile.
When mature sperm bind HA in solution they strongly increase their swimming vigor and velocity3. HA-stimulated
swimming gives these sperm an advantage in the selection
process.
HA is a component of
cervical mucus. Mature sperm with HA- stimulated swimming
have an advantage exiting the hostile environment of the
vagina passing through the cervical mucus and entering the
uterus.
HA is a major component
of the cumulus matrix, the viscous layer surrounding the
oocyte. Passage through the cumulus is facilitated by
HA-stimulated swimming.
HA-sperm interactions are also involved in other essential steps in normal conception, including capacitation and the acrosome reaction1,5.
D. When mature sperm encounter immobilized hyaluronan, they display a remarkable behavior— they bind themselves to the layer.
Binding changes the
visual appearance of the sperm from motile to immotile
The heads of HA-bound
sperm show no progressive movement
The sperm tail,
however, beats vigorously
True immotile sperm
show no motion in head or tail
Thus HA-bound sperms are easily distinguished from non-bound sperm.
A microdroplet of hyaluronan was bound to a Petri dish and sperm contacted to it.

Kinetics of Sperm Binding
Semen samples were videotaped for two-minute intervals over a 20-minute period. The mean percent un-bound sperm are shown versus incubation time. From these results, a minimum of ten minutes were required for complete binding to be established.
ASSAY SLIDE
HYDAK® HBA Sperm-Hyaluronan Binding Assay
The percentage of motile sperm that bind to hyaluronan is calculated by applying a semen sample to one of the
two hyaluronan-coated chambers of the HYDAK HBA slide and counting the bound and unbound motile sperm.
Double-chamber microscope slides (Cell-Vu®) were converted to HBA devices by coating both chambers with hyaluronan.
The proportion of mature sperm, competent to bind to immobilized HA was obtained by counting the unbound motile sperm cells (U) and the HA-bound sperms cells (B) in one of the chambers.
HA depth in the coated chambers was determined by dyeing with Toluidine Blue O and quantifying the bound dye4. The depth was less than 0.1 microns.
Sperm binding was
specific to hyaluronan: Sperm failed to bind to heparin,
chondroitin sulfate, carboxymethyl cellulose, methyl
cellulose, and poly (hydroxyethyl methacrylate).

Range of Percent Binding
Thirty sperm samples were assayed for binding before and after washing with human tubal fluid (HTF).
CONCLUSION
Hyaluronan-coated surfaces, such as sperm counting chambers, permit the differentiation of sperm populations competent to bind hyaluronan from non-binders. Such modified chambers should enable detailed study of the role of the sperm-hyaluronan interaction in normal fertilization.
References:
1. Sabeur, K. et al., 1998. Zygote. 6:103-111.
2. Kornovski, B. S. et al. 1994. Fertil. Steril. 61:935-40.
3. Huszar, G. et al., 1990 Fertil. Steril. 54:1127-34.
4. Johnston, J., 2000. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (Appl. Biomater.) 53:188-91
5. Huszar, G. et al., 1997. Biol. Reprod. 56:1020-24